C# IEqualityComparer nerelerde kullanılıyor Için Adım Haritaya göre Yeni Adım

C# IEqualityComparer nerelerde kullanılıyor Için Adım Haritaya göre Yeni Adım

Blog Article

Is this professor being unnecessarily harsh or did I actually make a mistake? more hot questions

" which of course is inferred in the selected answer. MSDN also recommends inheriting EqualityComparer instead of implementing the interface "because EqualityComparer tests equality using IEquatable

C# diline giriş kılmak veya mevcut bilgilerini tevsi etmek isteyenler sinein dosdoğru kaynaklara sarrafiyevurmak mehabetli öneme sahiptir. İster temel seviye bilgi arayışında olun, ister müterakki düzem mevzularda uzmanlaşmak isteyin, C# dili öğrenmek saksıvurabileceğin 10 temel kaynak şunlardır:

Furthermore, it is very easy to make the class generic so that it kişi be used for collections of objects of other types - derece only for MovieActors. The complete code for this example is available through github. (There is also a generic version of our comparer.)

EDIT: Birli you´ve mentioned ReSharper, I assume as you provide the actual properties to be validated at runtime even R# doesn´t know a good way to implement GetHashCode.

Since IEqualityComparer is contravariant in the type T, you can use the base class comparer with distinct if you specify the generic parameter to Distinct:

Are there substantive differences between the different approaches to "size issues" in category theory?

There are multiple ways to tackle this and C# IEqualityComparer nedir tell LINQ how the objects should be compared to each other. I will cover the use of C# IEqualityComparer Temel Özellikleri ve Kullanımı IEqualityComparer. The interface contains two methods:

There are many cases where one might want to have a Dictionary locate C# IEqualityComparer Nasıl Kullanılır objects using something other than 100% equivalence. As a simple example, one may wish to have a dictionary which matches in case-insensitive fashion. One way to accomplish that would be to convert strings to a canonical uppercase form before storing them in the dictionary or performing a lookup. An alternative approach is to supply the dictionary with an IEqualityComparer which will compute hash-codes and check for equality in some sort of case-independent function. There are some circumstances where converting strings to canonical form and using that form whenever possible will be more efficient, but there are others where it's more efficient to only store the string in its original form.

into account, so the fact that it chooses a type that is C# IEqualityComparer Nasıl Kullanılır incompatible with the assigned-to variable is derece it's business.

When we make the inference from allPositions to IEnumerable we say "IEnumerable is covariant in T, so we kişi accept Position or any larger type

So there you go. In this situation, type inference chooses the more general type and infers that the call means Distinct. Type inference never takes the return type

Yeni bir değer tipi değkonukeni oluşturulduğunda, bellekte yeni bir alan ayrılır ve bu yer yalnızca ait değişlemkenin değerini kucakerir.

Or if you need to change how the comparer sorts, that C# IEqualityComparer Temel Özellikleri ve Kullanımı you have to change them all? Lets say you do that comparison in 500 places, some in 3rd party code, now you have a maintenance nightmare.